King v. King
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
Appellant is the former husband of appellee. He contests the distribution of property ordered by the trial court in conjunction with the parties’ divorce. Specifically he challenges the valuation of his pension plan, which was subject to equitable distribution, and what he claims was the failure of the trial court to take into consideration in making its distribution of marital property the fact that appellee had resided since the date of separation in the marital residence rent free.
Initially, though, appellant contends that another hearing should be conducted on the equitable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruth v. RuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Gee v. GeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re Marriage of FairchildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Jerry L. C. v. Lucille H. C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Braderman v. BradermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Sergi v. SergiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Butcher v. ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.