Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Kelly
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 2000No. CV-98-0090-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Byron and Corinne Kelly were married in 1984 and divorced in 1997. During the marriage, both were employed by the federal government. Corinne participated in the Federal Employees Retirement System, a component of which is social security. Byron was enrolled in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), which does not include social security. In fact, Byron would lose a portion of his CSRS benefits if he ever received social security payments. See 5 U.S.C. § 8349 (1996). Thus, he characterizes a portion of his retirement as being “in lieu of’ such payments.
¶2…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marriage of Kohler v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- In Re Marriage of CrookIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Marriage of FlowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.