Legal Opinion

Braderman v. Braderman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1985No. 272 and 273PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

These cross-appeals arise from an order of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas in a divorce proceeding concerning the equitable distribution of marital property, alimony, and counsel fees. Roslyn S. Braderman, is the appellant in appeal No. 272 and Jáy R. Braderman is the appellant in appeal No. 273. In order to avoid the confusion which the . terms “appellant” and “appellee” would cause in dealing with these cross-appeals, the term “plaintiff-wife” will be used throughout this opinion to describe Roslyn S. Braderman and Jay R. Braderman will be designed as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hare v. HodginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sergi v. SergiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API