Legal Opinion

Falkenstein v. Falkenstein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 28, 2010No. 180828029; A141251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Petitioner filed a petition in the trial court for a stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent, her ex-husband. The court entered a temporary SPO and set a hearing to determine whether to continue the temporary SPO. After the hearing, the court entered a final SPO of unlimited duration. On appeal, respondent argues that the final SPO was not supported by sufficient evidence. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2007), 1 we agree and reverse.

Civil SPOs are governed by ORS 30.866. To obtain an SPO, a person files a petition in a circuit court. ORS 30.866(1). If probable cause for the SPO…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Osborne v. FaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jones v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. McGinnis-Aitken v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Amarillas v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Miley v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Campola v. ZekanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. T. J. N. v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API