Falkenstein v. Falkenstein
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Petitioner filed a petition in the trial court for a stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent, her ex-husband. The court entered a temporary SPO and set a hearing to determine whether to continue the temporary SPO. After the hearing, the court entered a final SPO of unlimited duration. On appeal, respondent argues that the final SPO was not supported by sufficient evidence. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2007), 1 we agree and reverse.
Civil SPOs are governed by ORS 30.866. To obtain an SPO, a person files a petition in a circuit court. ORS 30.866(1). If probable cause for the SPO…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Osborne v. FaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- McGinnis-Aitken v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Amarillas v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Miley v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Campola v. ZekanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- T. J. N. v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.