Legal Opinion

Braude v. Braude

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 2012No. 10ST0043MA; A146463; 10ST0044MA; A146464PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Respondents appeal the trial court’s entry of two stalking protective orders (SPOs).1 The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence supporting those orders. Because this is not an “exceptional case” justifying de novo review, we review the trial court’s factual findings for “any evidence” and its legal conclusions for errors of law. See Travis v. Strubel, 238 Or App 254, 256, 242 P3d 690 (2010) (explaining standard of review applicable to SPO appeals); ORAP 5.40(8)(c) (“The Court of Appeals will exercise its discretion to try the cause anew on the record or to make one or more…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Travis v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Osborne v. FaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. W. T. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Miller v. HoeferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Huber v. LandoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Daves v. KohanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Tesema v. BeleteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API