Legal Opinion

Amarillas v. White

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2012No. 113127Z0; A149377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Respondent appeals the trial court’s entry of a stalking protective order (SPO). The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence supporting that order. Because this is not an “exceptional case” justifying de novo review, we review the trial court’s factual findings for “any evidence” and its legal conclusions for errors of law. See Travis v. Strubel, 238 Or App 254, 256, 242 P3d 690 (2010) (explaining standard of review applicable to SPO appeals); ORAP 5.40(8)(c) (“The Court of Appeals will exercise its discretion to try the cause anew on the record or to make one or more factual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tesema v. BeleteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Gray v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. B. R. B. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. A. A. v. CunialCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. A. A. v. CunialCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API