Legal Opinion

Lee v. Levison

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1916No. S. F. No. 6948PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the Court

' MELVIN,

Action to recover damages for malicious prosecution of Emma C. Lee on a charge of embezzlement. The trial court granted a nonsuit on the motions of Alexander Levison and National Surety Company of New York. The action was dismissed as to the other defendants. Prom the judgment following the nonsuit and from an order denying their motion for a new trial Emma C. Lee and H. Lee (her husband) appeal.

The Levisons and Mary Ostroski owned an apartment house, and in July, 1908, Mr. Levison employed Mrs. Lee as manager thereof and as housekeeper. A few months later the National Surety Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grant v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Potter v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Booraem v. Potter Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Anderson v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Centers v. Dollar MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Hudson v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API