Pavel v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kincheloe, Judge:
The merchandise here in controversy consists of knit seamless glove linings which were assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 917 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at 45 per centum ad valorem as “articles of all kinds, knit or crocheted, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of cotton * * * not specially provided for,” with an additional duty of 10 cents per pound under paragraph 924 of said act on the cotton content therein having a staple of 1% inches or more in length. The plaintiffs claim the merchandise dutiable under paragraph 919 of the same act at 37)j…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Valentina, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Jack & Jill Togs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Protests 24985-G of F. Pavel & Co.United States Customs Court · 1942