Legal Opinion
Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 23, 1969No. 315, Docket 32697PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by the defendant, Parke, Davis & Co., from a judgment in a personal injury action which held that Parke, Davis’ biological product, Quadri-gen, was defective and that the defect caused injuries to plaintiff Erie Tinner-holm, then 3 months old, which have left him permanently disabled, both physically and mentally. The District Court awarded total damages in the amount of $651,783.52. We hold there was no error.
On the basis of substantial evidence the trial court found that about noon on Saturday, November 28, 1959, the infant plaintiff, Eric…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Schwartz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Stromsodt v. Parke-Davis and CompanyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1966
- Christopher v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Grayson v. Irvmar Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gary G. Bunting, as Father and Next Friend of Bradley Bunting, a Minor v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Chambers v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Judith A. Neal v. Honeywell Inc. And Alliant Techsystems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.