Judith A. Neal v. Honeywell Inc. And Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
The False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-31, penalizes contractors who submit fraudulent bills to the United States. Private citizens may pursue qui tarn actions under the Act, taking a portion of the recovery as reward (and incentive) for their efforts. In 1986 Congress added a whistleblower-protection provision, forbidding retaliation against employees who turn in their employers for violating the Act. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). About a year after the anti-retaliation provision went into effect, Judith Neal, an employee in Honeywell’s personnel department, discovered via…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Fischer v. Avanade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Michael Brandon, M.D. v. Anesthesia & Pain Management Associates, Ltd., Kumar S. Ravi, M.D., James R. Boivin, M.D., and Kathleen H. Slocum, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Marilynn K. Hammond, M.D. v. Northland Counseling Center, Inc. Greg WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Centennial Archaeology, Inc. v. AECOM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.