Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Desmond.
We granted leave to appeal in order to take another step toward a complete solution of the problem partially cleared up in Greenberg v. Lorenz (9 N Y 2d 195) and Randy Knitwear v. American Cyanamid Co. (11 N Y 2d 5) (both decided after the making of the Special Term and Appellate Division orders here appealed from). The question now to be answered is: does a manufacturer’s implied warranty *435of fitness of Ms product for its contemplated use run in favor of all its intended users, despite lack of privity of contract?
The suit is by an administratrix for damages for the death…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Peterson v. Lamb Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Middlleton v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.