Farmer v. Crosby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county refusing a new trial after a trial before Kerr, J., and a dismissal ordered.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action grew out of that of Crosby v. Farmer, 89 Minn. 305, (40 N. W. Rep. 71,) in which the plaintiff here was the defendant, and Oliver Crosby the plaintiff, and S. P. Crosby his attorney, and the judgment in which was set aside as void because there was no service of the summons upon the defendant. The allegations of the complaint are that in this former action the present defendants fraudulently and maliciously procured an officer to make a false return of personal service of the summons, and that, knowing such return to be false, they caused judgment on default to be entered against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crosby v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Granger v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Alworth v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Peck v. McLeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Hatch v. CoddingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
- Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- McDonald v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.