Hatch v. Coddington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, as executrix of E. A. C. Hatch, deceased, from •a judgment entered on the pleadings in the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., presiding. The former action mentioned in the pleadings and opinion is Hatch v. Coddington, 95 U. S. 48.
1Opinion of the Court
Mitchell, J.1
The second defence set up in the answer is a former adjudication. The reply sets out in full the pleadings, issues, evidence, and proceedings in the former action. The declaration in that case was in the ordinary form in a common-law action of trover. The material allegations were that on the 13th of May, 1859, the plaintiff was possessed, as of his own property, of 45 Minnesota state railroad bonds; that on the same day they came into the possession of ■defendant, who, although well knowing that they belonged to plaintiff, refused to deliver them to him upon request, but…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Bazille v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Mann v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Veline v. DahlquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Farmer v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Huffman v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.