Legal Opinion

In Re Stoliker

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1957No. Crim. 6079PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding petitioner seeks his transfer from the custody of the warden of the state prison at Folsom to the custody of the federal authorities in order that he may serve his sentence under his federal judgment of conviction and thereby gain the benefit of the provision of his state judgment of conviction relating to the concurrent running of his sentences.

Petitioner was arrested in this state on a charge of robbery. Shortly thereafter he was delivered by the state authorities to the federal authorities for trial on two federal charges involving the receiving of, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zerbst v. McPikeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. In Re RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ex Parte McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In Re SichofskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re RadovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Aycox v. LytleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Tony R. Jake v. G.L. Herschberger, Warden, Adx-Florence, Florence, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. In Re PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API