Legal Opinion

In Re Radovich

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1943No. Crim. 1835PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Petitioner, who is imprisoned in the State Prison at Folsom, alleges in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus that his imprisonment is unlawful in that his lawful term of fifteen years, “with benefit of credits earned and granted by formal resolution of the Board and not forfeited, ’ ’ has expired. The allegations of the petition further show the following:

On September 14, 1931, defendant, after having been found guilty of the crime of robbery, was sentenced by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to be imprisoned in the State Prison at Folsom for the term prescribed by law. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. SamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ex Parte McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re SandelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re StolikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re CalhounCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API