Tucker v. Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Chief Justice.
Appellant Randy Tucker appeals from an order of the Pope County Circuit Court that increased his child-support obligation from $45 per week to $1,809.92 per month, based on a net-worth approach. Appellees Regina Tucker and the Office of Child Support Enforcement (collectively referred to as OCSE) cross-appeal from the circuit court’s refusal to make the modification retroactive to the date of the filing of the petition for modification. Randy originally appealed to the court of appeals. The court of appeals affirmed the increase in child support on direct appeal, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ward v. DossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- McWhorter v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- City of Benton v. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Powell v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Gilbow v. TravisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Wright v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.