Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 2004No. 03-1466PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

Mary Rodriguez appeals from the Faulkner County Circuit Court’s order terminating her parental rights as to two of her children, Rosalinda and Imelda Rodriguez. We affirm the circuit court.

Rosalinda and Imelda are the children of Mary and Arturo Rodriguez. Arturo resides in Mexico, but Mary, a citizen of the United States who was born in Ohio, currently resides in Damascus, Arkansas. On August 24, 2001, the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) placed a 72-hour hold on Rosalinda and Imelda for their safety and protection due to the possible threat of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. J.T. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Wade v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Anderson v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Duke v. ShinpaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Royal Oaks Vista, LLC v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. BixlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API