Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. Pathe Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves “for an order, pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b) and 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [28 U.S.C.A.], striking out the second counter-claim contained in paragraph 17 of the answer as insufficient in law for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”. In the alternative, plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendant to give a more definite statement ' of said counter-claim. Defendant cross-moves “for an order, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing” each cause of action pleaded in the complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Buchholz v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. PRC Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Baker v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marion Simcox v. San Juan Shipyard, Inc., Etc., International Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Ginsberg v. ZagarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953