Legal Opinion

Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1953No. 5802PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVI S. UDALL, Justice.

Frank Anguiano, on March 26, 1952, commenced civil action No. 71601 in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, claiming damages for injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Defendants’ motion for security for costs was granted without opposition. Plaintiff wholly ignored the order and failed to comply therewith. Defendants moved under Rule 41(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, Sec. 21-916, A.C.A. 1939, to dismiss for failure to comply with the order of the court. This motion was unopposed, and the court granted it, thus dismissing the action. This order of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Olsen v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Mas v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. Topping v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Hoff v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Phillips v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Cassidy's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Flynn v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API