Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Getty

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1994No. C8-85-2372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following a 2-day hearing, Judge Bruce W. Christopherson, referee, found that respondent Paris DonRay Getty had committed multiple acts of professional misconduct. Respondent has a history of misconduct; this court has disciplined him twice. The referee recommended disbarment or, in the alternative, indefinite suspension. Because respondent ordered a transcript, the referee’s findings and conclusions are subject to review. Respondent’s misconduct, as found by the referee, includes the following:

Trout Matter

Russell Trout paid respondent $2,200 to represent him in a property dispute in…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Matter of Discipline of GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCOYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RedburnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrehmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API