Legal Opinion

E. M. Boerke, Inc. v. Williams

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1965PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The defendant on appeal, for the first time, alleges that the cause of action is fatally defective because there was a failure to allege or prove that the plaintiff was a licensed real-estate broker as required by sec. 136.11, Stats. 2

A defense of this nature cannot be raised initially in the appellate court. Berning v. Giese (1957), 274 Wis. 401, 80 N. W. (2d) 270; Discher v. Industrial Comm. (1960), 10 Wis. (2d) 637, 103 N. W. (2d) 519.

The defendant contends that this issue was raised by the general language of its motion for dismissal which included the prayer to the court that the action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn & Stringer Investment Co. v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Munson v. FurrerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Levy v. BirnscheinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Discher v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Scheuer & Tiegs, Inc. v. BenedictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chevrolet Division, General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. BrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Silides v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API