Legal Opinion

Dunn & Stringer Investment Co. v. Krauss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Whether the plaintiff real-estate broker is entitled to a commission on the. purchase price of the premises sold by the defendant owners directly to the purchaser Howard Miller after the expiration date of the listing contract is dependent upon the proper interpretation of the clause in the listing contract having reference to sales made directly by the owners after such expiration date. Such clause provided that a commission was due on any such sale if made “within six (6) months after the termination hereof to anyone with whom you [the plaintiff broker] negotiated during the lije of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Munson v. FurrerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. L. W. Smith & Co. v. RomadkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. E. M. Boerke, Inc. v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. George Nangen & Co. v. Kenosha Auto Transport Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API