Legal Opinion

GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. Brimmel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

As a defense, the defendant-appellant now raises for the first time the contention that the present plaintiff is a corporation and that there is no evidence to show that the debts due its predecessor, a partnership, were assigned to the corporate plaintiff. We make no determination of the merits of this defense, for, as this court has frequently said, we will not countenance the raising of issues for the first time in this court when they might well have been disposed of at or prior to trial. E. M. Boerke, Inc., v. Williams (1965), 28 Wis. (2d) 627, 631, 137 N. W. (2d) 489. While we have said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arjay Investment Co. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Utschig v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. E. M. Boerke, Inc. v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Culligan, Inc. v. RheaumeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Nelson v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Puttkammer v. MinthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Green Quarries, Inc. v. RaaschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Seegers v. SpragueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Advance Leasing & Crane Co. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API