Levy v. Birnschein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Section 136.11, Stats., became effective June 26, 1929. It requires any one acting in the capacity of a real-estate broker or real-estate salesman within this state who brings an action for the collection of commission or compensation for acts mentioned in ch. 136, to allege and prove that such person, firm, or corporation was a duly licensed real-estate broker or salesman at the time the alleged cause of action arose.
This placed upon the appellant the burden of showing that he was a duly licensed real-estate salesman at the time involved in his complaint. The cause of action arose…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis & Starr Lumber Co. v. PorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Payne v. VolkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Sherman v. LanghamTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Klaus v. City of Greek BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Schoene v. HickamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- E. M. Boerke, Inc. v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Reed v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Kemmerer v. RoscherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.