Chevrolet Division, General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The issues on this appeal are:(1) Is mandamus an available remedy to review the action of the commission in refusing to consider and act upon General Motors’ petition for review of the examiner’s findings and interlocutory order ?
*485(2) Was such petition for review timely “filed” with the commission within the requirement of sec. 102.18 (3), Stats. ?
Availability of Mandamus as a Remedy.
The commission contends that the available court remedy to review its actions in workmen’s compensation proceedings is an action for review to be instituted in the circuit court for Dane county as provided by sec.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State ex rel. Madison Airport Co. v. WrabetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Cook v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Berg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Trczyniewski v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Beloit Education Ass'n v. Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Refining Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.