Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Varner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1960No. 527PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmáN, J.

The sole question now for consideration is the correctness of the ruling nonsuiting the counterclaim of Varner. The judgment entered at the September Term on Varner’s motion dismissing plaintiff’s action against Varner did not affect Varner’s claim against plaintiff. Varner’s cause of action stated as a counterclaim remained on the docket and required a determination. G.S. 1-183.1.

Varner cannot recover from plaintiff unless plaintiff negligently caused damage to Varner’s motor vehicle. To establish negligence proximately causing damage, Varner alleged that plaintiff was operating…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hines v. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Toyomenka, Inc. And Wilmington Shipping Company v. Mount Hope Finishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Reed v. HinderlandArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hardison v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API