Hines v. Frink
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, J.,
Appellant’s first assignment of error relates to the testimony of the investigating officers that the license plate on Gore’s Dodge truck had been issued for an International truck which he found out later had been junked. This hearsay was, of course, incompetent and totally irrelevant. However, it is inconceivable that it could have affected the verdict. Jurors are presumed to be persons of “sufficient intelligence”. Murphy v. Power Company, 196 N.C. 484, 146 S.E. 204. Technical error will not authorize a new trial unless it appears that the objecting party was prejudiced thereby,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Armentrout v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Gay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.