Legal Opinion

Reed v. Hinderland

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1983No. 15827PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

This action arose out of an accident between a truck, owned by appellee Epic Extruded Plastics, Inc. [Epic] and driven by appellee Edward Hinderland, and an automobile owned by appellant McCoy Reed and driven by his son, Arlen Reed. Appellant suffered severe physical injuries. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants and judgment was entered accordingly. After his motion for new trial was denied, appellant brought this appeal, which was trans°ferred to this court pursuant to rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S. We reverse the trial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lakin Cattle Company v. EngelthalerArizona Supreme Court · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Buckholtz v. BuckholtzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. Watson v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API