Reed v. Hinderland
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
This action arose out of an accident between a truck, owned by appellee Epic Extruded Plastics, Inc. [Epic] and driven by appellee Edward Hinderland, and an automobile owned by appellant McCoy Reed and driven by his son, Arlen Reed. Appellant suffered severe physical injuries. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants and judgment was entered accordingly. After his motion for new trial was denied, appellant brought this appeal, which was trans°ferred to this court pursuant to rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S. We reverse the trial…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Lakin Cattle Company v. EngelthalerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Buckholtz v. BuckholtzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Watson v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.