Legal Opinion

Toyomenka, Inc. And Wilmington Shipping Company v. Mount Hope Finishing Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1970No. 13889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge:

This action for conversion involves title to certain textile goods imported into this country for sale. The plaintiff Toyomenka, Inc., 1 the importer, claiming ownership, sought recovery for their value both from (1) the defendant Wilmington Shipping Company, 2 which, acting as customs broker for Toyomenka in the receipt of such goods, had erroneously shipped the goods for finishing from port of entry to its co-defendant, Mount Hope Finishing Company, 3 a textile finisher, as the property of one Harold A. Jason, Inc., 4 a textile converter, and (2) from the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Evans Products Co. v. JorgensenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Southern Cross Steamship Co., Inc. v. Georgios FiripisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  3. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. Stan Cross Buick, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Whitehurst v. . Fcx Fruit and Vegetable ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  2. Krause v. Sacramento InnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Touch of Class Leasing v. Mercedes-Benz Credit of Canada, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Zaretsky v. William Goldberg Diamond Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Jensen-McLean Co. v. Crouthamel Potato Chip Co. (In Re Crouthamel Potato Chip Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API