Legal Opinion
Smith v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1936No. Civ. 10192PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAAS, J., pro tem.
The salient facts of this case as set forth in the brief of respondents Stella M. Atwood and Julia Myers, and the contention of the parties herein, are as follows :
“Respondents Atwood and Myers being the owners of a considerable tract of land in Riverside County, arranged with Messrs. Millar, Stearns, Davis and Webster, to subdivide and sell out the property. ’ ’ (A tract of 410 acres in the Perris Valley, Riverside County, known as Edgemont Gardens). “The mechanics of the arrangement were handled by means of a subdivision trust with the predecessor of the Bank of America…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- King v. GotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Skelly Oil Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Hocking v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- County National Bank & Trust Co. v. SheppardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hall v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Wright v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.