King v. Gotz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action of ejectment to recover a lot of land in the form of a parallelogram, twenty-five feet by sixty feet and ten inches, near Golden Gate Avenue and Laguna Street, San Francisco. The cause was tried by the court, and findings in writing filed, upon which judgment in favor of plaintiff was entered for a strip of land across the north end of and parcel of the lot sued for, eight feet four inches in width by twenty-five feet in length.
The appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The demanded premises constitute the southerly or rear…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- SOULARD AND OTHERS v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Mann v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Spencer v. GeissmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Lupertino v. CarbahalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ponsonby v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.