Legal Opinion

Hall v. Fitzgerald

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1983No. 18371PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is a suit by vendors against purchasers to foreclose a real estate contract. The principal issue is the meaning of paragraph 16C of the uniform real estate contract, which entitles the vendors to treat a defaulted contract as a note and mortgage and proceed to foreclosure. The district court gave summary judgment for the vendors, and the purchasers appeal, arguing (1) that there was a genuine issue of material fact, and (2) that the vendors were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Purchasers also contend (3) that the judgment should have been set aside because of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Charter Township of Pittsfield v. City of SalineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. Primary Children's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. D & L SUPPLY v. SauriniUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bonneville Tower Condominium Management Committee v. Thompson Michie Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API