Hall v. Fitzgerald
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
This is a suit by vendors against purchasers to foreclose a real estate contract. The principal issue is the meaning of paragraph 16C of the uniform real estate contract, which entitles the vendors to treat a defaulted contract as a note and mortgage and proceed to foreclosure. The district court gave summary judgment for the vendors, and the purchasers appeal, arguing (1) that there was a genuine issue of material fact, and (2) that the vendors were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Purchasers also contend (3) that the judgment should have been set aside because of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Charter Township of Pittsfield v. City of SalineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. Primary Children's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- D & L SUPPLY v. SauriniUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Bonneville Tower Condominium Management Committee v. Thompson Michie Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.