Legal Opinion
Protex-A-Kar Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1951No. Civ. 17927PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief in which plaintiff seeks a judicial interpretation of its rights under three policies of products liability insurance, one of which was issued by defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and two by Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London.
Plaintiff and cross-complainant The Troy Company are appealing from the judgment determining the liabilities of defendant insurance companies under their respective policies.
There are but two questions for determination: (1) Are defendant insurance companies liable under their policies for damage occurring after the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Blackburn v. Home Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Brickell v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Finkbohner v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Singsaas v. DiederichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.