Legal Opinion
Singsaas v. Diederich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1976No. 45636PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Douglas K. Amdahl, Justice. *
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Yellow Medicine County determining that bodily injuries, occurring after cancellation of a general liability insurance policy with completed operations hazard and products hazard endorsements but caused by negligence occurring while the policy was in effect prior to cancellation, were not covered by the policy. Affirmed.
The parties stipulated, for purposes of this declaratory judgment action only and so far as material here, that prior to December 1971, Jerome A. and Daniel Diederich organized a business partnership…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Samuelson v. DouthirtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Kissel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Scott v. KeeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Paul J. Mraz v. Canadian Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Bartholomew v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.