Pinckney v. Baker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Plaintiff Robin Walden Pinckney (Pinckney) and third-party defendant/counter plaintiff Kimi Ann Luces (Luces) appeal the trial court’s judgment dismissing the claims of each against defendant/third party plaintiff Joseph Cline Baker (Baker). Pinckney and Luces maintain the court committed reversible error, inter alia, by instructing the jury on the doctrine of sudden emergency. We find merit in this contention and award a new trial.
Relevant factual and procedural information includes the following: On 21 February 1995, Pinckney was a passenger in an automobile operated by Luces on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Masciulli v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Banks v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Long v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Sobczak v. VorholtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007