Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Champion
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Nationwide’s Appeal
Nationwide first contends the trial court erred in its order of 21 September 1984 by not permitting Nationwide to offer as a defense that the third-party actions had been brought in violation of the “no action” provision of its policy. In its pleadings, Nationwide alleged as a defense that the third-party actions were brought in violation of Condition Six of the policy it issued to Champion and that such actions were premature because the liability of Champion had not yet been judicially determined or agreed upon by the parties. Condition Six of the policy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Satterwhite v. StolzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Stanback v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Duke University v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Lambe Realty Investment, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Naddeo v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- In re Will of McFaydenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.