Legal Opinion

Coffeyville Gas Co. v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1906No. 14,466PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. FLANNELLY, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:-

The defendants in error brought this action to recover for legal services alleged to have been performed by them for the Coffeyville ■ Gas Company upon its request. The defendant as an answer filed *759its general denial. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs.

The petition in error does not assign as error the denying of the defendant’s motion for a new trial; therefore no questions arising upon the trial of the cause can be considered by this court. (Struthers v. Fuller, 45 Kan. 735, 26 Pac. 471; Dryden v. C. K. & N. Rly. Co., 47 Kan. 445, 28 Pac. 153; National Bank v. Jaffray, 41…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Cogshall v. SpurrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Struthers v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Clark v. SchnurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. First National Bank v. JaffraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Heniff v. ClausenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Mathis v. Public School District No. 103Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Gale v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API