Coffeyville Gas Co. v. Dooley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. FLANNELLY, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:-
The defendants in error brought this action to recover for legal services alleged to have been performed by them for the Coffeyville ■ Gas Company upon its request. The defendant as an answer filed *759its general denial. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs.
The petition in error does not assign as error the denying of the defendant’s motion for a new trial; therefore no questions arising upon the trial of the cause can be considered by this court. (Struthers v. Fuller, 45 Kan. 735, 26 Pac. 471; Dryden v. C. K. & N. Rly. Co., 47 Kan. 445, 28 Pac. 153; National Bank v. Jaffray, 41…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Cogshall v. SpurrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Struthers v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Clark v. SchnurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- First National Bank v. JaffraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Heniff v. ClausenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Mathis v. Public School District No. 103Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Gale v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.