Clark v. Schnur
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Shawnee Superior Court. Ejectment. Judgment for plaintiffs Sehnur and another, at the January term, 1886. The defendant Ciarle brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
The assignments of error in this case are as follows:
1. The court erred in its instructions given to the jury on the trial of the action.
2. The court erred in admitting certain evidence of the plaintiff, to which the defendant objected.
3. The court erred in ruling out the evidence of Israel Zimmerman and Susannah L. Zimmerman, offered by Lucinda Clark oil the trial of the action, over the objection of the said Lucinda Clark, to which ruling she excepted at the time.
4. The judgment was given for Amanda Schnur and Alma J. Proctor, when it ought to have been given for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carson v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Coffeyville Gas Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- J. J. Douglas Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Struthers v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.