Carson v. Funk
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Chase District Court. At the May Term, 1881, of the district court, Funic, as plaintiff, had judgment against Carson, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The assignments of error contained in the petition in error filed in this court are as follows:
1. That the verdict of the jury was not sustained by sufficient evidence.
2. That the verdict was contrary to law.
3. That there were errors of law occurring at the trial of the cause, and excepted to by this plaintiff in error at the time.
The only questions attempted to be presented by the plaintiff in error in his brief are upon the third assignment of error. The first and second assignments are waived by him, and therefore will not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- DaLee v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Wolfley v. RisingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Woodall v. GreaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Briggs v. TyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cass CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Coffeyville Gas Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Crawford v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.