Legal Opinion

Heniff v. Clausen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 35,393PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action to enjoin defendant from obstructing or in any way interfering with plaintiff’s use of a right of way of ingress and egress across defendant’s land from and to a public highway which plaintiff alleged he had acquired by implication from the common grantor of both tracts, and also by prescription. There was a second cause of action for damages, but the trial court spéciñcally ' reserved this, and no trial ever was had upon it. After a hearing a temporary injunction was allowed January 26, 1938. Defendant filed an answer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Drenning v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Phillipson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Miller v. WhistlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Holmes v. KalbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Hamilton v. BingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Lambeth v. BogartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Davidson v. McKownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API