Legal Opinion
Cogshall v. Spurry
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from Crawford District Court. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The assignments of error in this case are as follows:
“1. The said court erred in the instructions given to the jury on the trial of the said action.
“2. The court erred in admitting evidence in the trial of said action.
“3. The verdict was contrary to the evidence.
“4. The said judgment was given for the said S. W. Spurry when it ought to have been given for these plaintiffs.”
It will be seen that nothing is said in the assignments of error with regard to a motion for a new trial. There was a motion for a new trial, however, made and filed in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crawford v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Struthers v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Haynes v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Wheeler v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.