Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1928No. Docket No. 3507PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

The complaint in this action is based upon a charge of cruelty. The cross-complaint consists of two causes of action, the first being desertion, the second cruelty. The court found against the plaintiff and appellant as to all of her allegations of cruelty, and in favor of the defendant and respondent as to all of his allegations of cruelty, and in his favor on his charge of desertion against the plaintiff and appellant. The interlocutory decree of divorce was granted to the defendant and respondent specifically on the charge of desertion against the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sargent v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. In Re Estate of EspinosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Heinz v. HeinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Tyler v. TylerWyoming Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API