East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. Allen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Action for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Alonzo S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
The reversal of this judgment' is urged for three reasons, set up in appellant’s printed argument. First, because. the court erred in sustaining demurrer to special pleas. In support of this contention it is said, this was an action of trespass, and under the plea of the general issue in that form of action, appellant could not avail itself of the defenses set up in the special pleas, but must plead them specially. Hence, they did not amount to a plea of the general issue, and were not obnoxious to the demurrer for that cause. It appears by the amended declaration, filed by leave of the court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago West Division Railway Co. v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Wormsdorf v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sample v. Consolidated Light & Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Fowler v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Lecklieder v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908
- Elguth v. GrueszkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Muren Coal & Ice Co. v. HowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903