Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the opinion found in 56 Mich. 559.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This action is brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff, when about two years and six months old, from a passing'train going east over its road in the township of Kimball, in the county of St. Olair. The case was before us at the April term, 1885 (see 56 Mich. 559), and a new trial was granted, which has been had, and the plaintiff allowed to recover a judgment for $7,000. The defendant brings error, and 37 assignments are presented for our consideration. They are, however, classified and presented by counsel for defendant in their briefs under nine propositions,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Brownell v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- People v. VernonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Johnson v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Peirce v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GrablinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.