Legal Opinion

Wormsdorf v. Detroit City Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This action was brought to recover damages arising from an injury to plaintiff while riding upon a street-car.

The negligence of the defendant was alleged to have consisted in neglecting to furnish proper and safe brakes and appliances for slacking the speed of cars in going a down grade, or for stopping a car, and in wrongfully and negligently furnishing and providing a braking apparatus with a weak, cracked, and defective connecting rod, which was utterly inadequate, unsafe, and positively dangerous to life and limb; that the rod was partly cracked and broken, and ■its situation and location…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hilts v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Thompson v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Forsell v. Pittsburgh & Montana Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API