Lecklieder v. Chicago City Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
It is sought to reverse the judgment upon the grounds that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, and is against its manifest preponderance, that there was error in the admission and exclusion of evidence and that the court erred in refusing instructions requested in defendant’s behalf. There is conflict in the testimony and defendant’s counsel in their briefs review it at length. As the cause must be retried because of what this court deems reversible error in the admission of evidence, we refrain from considering the objection that the evidence does not justify the verdict and that…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Greinke v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Globe Accident Insurance v. GerischIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. BundyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. GieseIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. UhterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lecklieder v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Condon v. Chicago Railways Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Mathes v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Cowen v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912