Legal Opinion
Tilley v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided July 11, 2003No. 1:02CV629PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIXON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an action for refund of taxes, brought by Plaintiffs Thomas E. Tilley and Iris M. Tilley (“Tilleys”). Defendant United States of America (“United States”) has filed a motion [Doc. # 13] to dismiss and for summary judgment. The United States has also filed a motion [Doc. # 19] for protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c) protecting it from having to respond to the Tilleys’ discovery requests. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). In this posture, the matter is ripe for disposition.
I.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- O'MEARA v. WatersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Baron Financial Corp. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Stone v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. MeentsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Franklin Livestock, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.