Legal Opinion
Baron Financial Corp. v. Natanzon
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 13, 2006No. SKG-03-3563PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Non-Party Witness Stuart R. Rombro’s Motion for Protective Order. The issue is fully briefed and a telephone conference was held before the Court on December 12, 2006. For the reasons discussed below, the Court hereby DENIES Mr. Rombro’s motion.
I. Background
On December 15, 2004, Baron Financial Corporation (“Baron” or “plaintiff’) filed a Second Amended Complaint (“2004 Matter”) against Rony Natanzon (“Mr.Natanzon”) and several other defendants including ERN Acquisition, LLC (“ERN”) and Stuart R. Rom-bro…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Hachette Distribution, Inc. v. Hudson County News Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Simpson v. Specialty Retail Concepts, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Webb v. Green Tree Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. MeentsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Small v. RamseyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2012
- 2023 BR Holdings, LLC v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- AFT Michigan v. Project VeritasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.