Legal Opinion

Stone v. Trump

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. GLR-17-2459PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order

1. Standard of Review

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a district court "must consider timely objections" to a USMJ's order on nondispositive, pretrial matters and "modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." "The 'clearly erroneous' standard applies to factual findings, while legal conclusions will be rejected if they are 'contrary to law.' " Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. Discovery Commc'ns, LLC, 28 F.Supp.3d 465, 479 (D. Md. 2014).

Under the clearly erroneous standard, the reviewing court does…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Maryland Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  2. Barnett v. CummingsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2023
  3. Bost v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  4. Brennan v. Deluxe CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. CMDS Residential, LLC v. Mayor and City Council Of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API