Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Hampton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7521DC826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

In order to be entitled to alimony pendente lite one must be a dependent spouse, and the provisions of G.S. 50-16.3 must be met. In Little v. Little, 18 N.C App. 311, 196 S.E. 2d 562 (1973), this Court stated that the trial court must make findings of fact to show three requirements: (1) the existence of a marital relationship; (2) the spouse is either (a) actually or substantially dependent upon the other spouse for maintenance and support, or (b) is substantially in need of maintenance and support from the other spouse; and (3) the supporting spouse is capable of making the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Poston v. PostonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Byrd v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Musten v. MustenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Robbins v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API